Wednesday, November 25th, 2009 | Author: admin
Abby Johnson, 29, stands outside a Planned Parenthood clinic in Bryan, Tex., alongside Shawn Carney of the Campaign for Life. Johnson quit after watching an ultrasound of an abortion.
She had to see it to change her heart, but thank God it did. What will it take for the Christian to see this is a murder, not a political issue. Unfortunately, EVERYONE WHO PROFESSES TO BE SAVED REALLY IS BORN AGAIN.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,571215,00.html
Category: The Whole Pro-Choice Agenda
Roe v. Wade can be summed up in this short statement;
A woman’s right to KILL trumps “HER” BABY’S right to LIVE
Roe v. Wade can be summed up in this short statement;
A woman’s right to KILL trumps “HER” BABY’S right to LIVE
I would like to EXPOSE a young lady I saw last night on Fox. Her name is Alicia Menendez.
I quoted the above again, because it fits right in with what she had to say about a Congressional Race going on in Florida between Daniel Webster and Alan Grayson.
In short, she is saying that pro-lifers want to force women to have abortions in the cases of incest and rape. Alicia Menendez is not as smart as one would think with a “Harvard” degree. This is not the pro-life position. Women have ALWAYS had the right to choose, we just want that choice criminalized. SO SHE BELIEVES THAT SHE CAN “CRAFTILY” use the word “FORCE” and it just go unnoticed.
My rebuttle to her is that she cares more about a women’s right to choose that a child’s right to live, AND not once did she mention the CHILD, a favorite of pro-aborts. But she also did not mention bringing the rapist or the relative to justice.
The Supreme Court did not grant women the right to choose abortion, they gave them the right to kill legally. Notice that word “GAVE”……… It was an immoral right given unconstitutionally by MEN to women to kill.
And remember Alicia, the science already dictated and the Supremes never dealt with the fact that life begins at conception in their ruling. So I would like to let you and EVERY OTHER PRO-ABORTIONIST in on something. Your crowd is responsible for the death of aout 50,000,000 dead babies. Maybe this will soothe your conscious a bit. If you account for the one’s that were for incest and rape, it’s 750,000, so that still makes you responsible for supporting the “murders” of 49,250,000 babies.
But allow me to ask you a question Alicia Menedez, HAVE YOU EVER SEEN AN ABORTION? HAVE YOU EVER SEEN ONE ON FILM? HAVE YOU EVER SEEN THE PICTURES OF THE VARIOUS BABY PARTS, ETC…………… I doubt it, and if you did, you would call it sensationalism.
So I say to Alicia Menedez that she agrees with this statement, that A woman’s right to KILL trumps “HER” BABY’S right to LIVE. Sad thing is she is passing her HUMANISTIC WORLDVIEWS to other unfortunate young girls.
OUR CONSTITUTION PROTECTS THE UNBORN
The Preamble to the Constitution AND The Declaration of Independence BOTH protect future UNBORN generations.
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” The Preamble to the Constitution.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain “unalienable rights”, that among these are “life”, “liberty” and the pursuit of happiness.”
Declaration of Independence
The UNBORN, our POSTERITY have just as much RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY, and THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS, as ANYONE ELSE, including their selfish mothers who want to kill them. Those RIGHTS are UNALIENABLE, which means they CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY. I want ANY liberal, pro-abortion to prove this wrong.
ABORTION IS MURDER. THE SUPREME LAW OF THIS COUNTRY SAYS SO, IRREGARDLESS OF WHAT 7 MEN SAID IN 1973.
A woman’s right to privacy does not trump when that privacy is being used to KNOWINGLY COMMIT A CRIME, especially a crime of MURDER.
I noticed you tried so hard to keep gnawing at the old bone of Republicans wanting to force raped women to have babies. Not once did I hear a call from you to catch and convict the rapsit of the crime, nor did I once here you mention the Constitutional Rights of the child. Have you ever read the preamble to the Constitution of the United States, or the opining of the Declaration of Independence?
“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
See that word posterity? It means something, and you were actually a part of that statement “before” you were born. If you delve deep enough, it’s obvious that the same men who GAVE you this right, could have easily followed the law and not given it to women.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
You are smart. You know what unalienable means, and you are also very well aware that this document was written for ALL mankind, present and future.
See Alicia, what you have here is a dilemna. You must deny the right to the child in the favor of having compassion on the woman. That’s what Reagan so eloquently stated about liberals. You all want to constrain what is morally right, and hide behind the bowels of compassion. BUT WHERE IS COMPASSION FOR BOTH THE WOMEN AND THE CHILD? You liberals always forget the child. Shame on you all……….
http://aliciamenendez.com/2010/10/07/video-on-oreilly-re-grayson-vs-webster/#comments
Alicia is still poppong off at the mouth about Republicans wanting to force women to have babies, but what is she NOT saying? I have found that this is often key in political debates and questions of the heart and conscience.
You know that beer commercial wherer the man can say all day he loves the beer, but when the woman asks how he feels about her, HE CAN’T say the word love? That’s what the woman wants to hear, and by that statement missing, you leave the other person abandoned and in limbo. Well this is the case with the woman and her unborn child. For the woman who wants the abortion, you lay out the red carpet for HER. If she wants to have the baby, you throw a baby shower for THEM. You become that child’s baby sitter, God parent, etc. But if this person chooses abortion, there’s no loss for your selfish behind. So you see, everyone loses with pro-abortion.
Well what Alicia IS NOT saying is that pro-aborts refuse to defend the little baby inside the womb, so in essence they are promoting two things. A choice to allow the child to live or a choice to kill the child. So they play neutral. They don’t say you have to kill, and they don’t say, you have to keep the baby. SO they are not defending the child either. But here’s the real logic, if you are pro-choice for abortion, you are pro-abortion.
But for reality sake, most progressives are population control advocates, so what’s a little bastard child getting aborted going to hurt. Well what else is Alicia not telling the women involved? The serious and lifelong trauma of KNOWING they have not just murdered, but murdered their own child.